Risk Index
Ranks locations by risk relative to the traffic actually passing through them.
Rank corridors by risk
Most government transportation agencies are managing thousands of locations with the budget to only treat a handful. The question is never whether a road could be safer. It is where to spend first, and how to prove that the investment worked.
Ranking intersections and corridors by risk, ahead of an incident rather than after one
Checking which work zones match the permit file and which appeared without one
Keeping an asset inventory current: signs, markings, surface condition, roadside assets
Measuring whether an intervention worked, by comparing the same location against itself over time
Building the evidence base for a funding application or a safety action plan
Answering a councillor, a journalist or a resident about a specific junction
All of it comes from sensors already deployed in those streets, so there are no roadside sensors to install and no collection program to stand up first.
Ranks locations by risk relative to the traffic actually passing through them.
Rank corridors by riskReads the network as vehicles pass, and reports what changed since last week rather than a single survey reading.
See what changed this weekOpens the footage behind a location when a specific question needs a specific answer.
See the events behind itScores what is about to happen at a location, so a developing conflict can be read before it becomes a collision.
Read conflicts before impactAggregated and de-identified by design so any public agency can plainly say they are protecting privacy while improving road conditions.
Name a city, corridor, or safety question and we will share insights with you.
We reply within one business day.